Sunday, February 10, 2013

A632.4.5.RB Deception in Negotiations_Reyes,Cassandra


During the course of negotiations, people often misrepresent information to gain at least a temporary advantage. For example, a seller may fabricate existence of another interested buyer or a buyer may misrepresent the price and availability of an item from a different vendor. Reflect on deceptions in negotiations and describe four ways to evaluate information during negotiations. Relate an example of a recent negotiation in which you have been misled and one in which you may have overstated a claim.; define how far you would be willing to go to leverage your position.

Negotiations are a part of everyday life. When I think about my daily routine, I can’t even count how many times I actually may be negotiating my place. First thing in the morning I am already making negotiations with my husband and vice versa. I’ll changer her diaper, if you give her a bath.” I will rinse the dishes if you put them in the dish washer.” Even more I count how many times I try and negotiate with my 7 month daughter who probably has no idea what I am saying most of the time. “Mommy will give you some ice cream if you can just say Mama, say Mama” or “Mommy’s so tired hunny, if you go to bed we can all take a nice fun loooong nap together.” Negotiations are constantly made at work as well. My boss always says he is scared when I get up from my chair to walk in his office because he knows I will have something for him to do. “So I was wondering if there was a way to better our communication with the Registrar’s department in regards to the HEOM prospects. If we can come up with something to better initiate the application process, I promise to take the project head on myself.”

The truth about negotiations is that it happens constantly but during the process of negotiating it is also very common to know that many times people may be misrepresenting themselves or their information. While lies of omission and lies of commission are both committed, it is important for us to understand that the information provided to us may not always be accurate. “In addition to distinguishing between lies of omission and lies of commission, lies can also be classified according to the type of information represented. (Wharton 2001)” Therefore, it is imperative that individuals take the time to listen, negotiate their own terms if possible and then make decisions that they feel would benefit them best based off of what they know and not what they are being told.

Examples of the classification of lies include a negotiator’s  misrepresentation of their reservation prices, interests, intentions, and material facts. While this list is important to consider when negotiating, it is also important to remember that lies are also categorized according to the object of the lie. “Lies can be told about oneself, about the target, about another person, or about an object or event. Finally, we can distinguish between lies according to whether the primary motivation of the lie is to promote one’s own interests, or to promote someone else’s interests. (Wharton 2001).”

In order to evaluate information during negotiations we should try a number of tactics in order to ensure that the information we are receiving is valuable, correct and beneficial to the decision we are looking to make. Before negotiating, individuals should prepare a variety of questions that they would like to ask. A good tactic is to ask the question in different forms or to ask similar questions multiple times. They should also evaluate the motivations of their negotiators by checking to see what their goals and incentives are. Considering the setting of the negotiator is also key in verifying whether or not they are more or less likely to misrepresent themselves. Checking for nonverbal cues, and different media for interaction such as video conferencing, email, and phone can also detect whether or not negotiators are more likely to use deception.

In order to ensure that the negotiation will move forward the way it should, negotiators should establish trust, ask direct questions and listen carefully to the information being provided. Paying attention to non verbal cues and keeping record of things in writing is also a great way to ensure that the information being provided does not change as plans to go through with the negotiation come to a close. After negotiations have been completed, it is vital that the previous steps listed are followed again. Letting your guard down is one way for negotiators to take advantage of future business with you. Therefore, build a questionable trust, where the process above is completed in a thorough manner to ensure the likelihood of deception is low.

One example of a situation where I have been misled was when an old co worker of mine was hired. The co worker had informed my bosses and team that he had previous knowledge of the University, systems we used, and was well versed in our SOC (Service Members Opportunity Colleges contract. I immediately knew there was an issue with the new hire the minute I started to train him. He was having extreme difficulty with how to move through the systems and was asking questions in retrospect he should have known already. Due to his military and background his “experience” with SOC, he should have been able to jump onto the team and put his efforts into the military members who fell under this contract. Instead, our prospects and SOC students were not being assisted and falling through the loop.

My team and I were frustrated. For three months we were left with extra work and agitated students. When our co worker came to us the fourth month he was there and informed us he would be leaving to another department, I have to admit my team and I were not the least bit surprised or disappointed. It was almost a relief for us to be losing a team member as he had brought so many issues to our team. Upon his departure, the team started to rebuild and we actually worked best without him. We created a flow that would work for a team of three and found that a team of three wasn’t so bad after all. This experience taught us all about the importance of recognizing the effects misrepresentation can have on our team and department as a whole.

A time when I overstated a claim was when I told my husband that I “kind of” messed up his computer. I was working on my husband’s computer one day and after a long while on Pinterest and a few of my other girly favorite sites, I opened a link and the computer had crashed. I thought to fix it I would need to shut the computer down and then re start it and that would be it. I was wrong. I could not get the computer to start at all. I called my husband and said. I think I “kind of” messed up your computer knowing full well that it wasn’t working at all. My husband said okay and that he would come home and fix it. When he got home he tried everything to get the computer to work. Nothing worked. As savvy as he was with technology he could not figure out what the issue was. He hoped it was not the hard drive as his warranty was up. He took it to IT the next day and of course the hard drive had crashed.

I could tell my husband was upset and tried his best not to say anything to me. He had to send his computer out and pay a fairly large fee for the computer to be fixed. On top of that they had found a crack on the screen from when I had accidentally pressed to hard on the screen from trying to fix the computer myself. He was hit with another fee and the computer was sent on its way. My husband did not say much the whole drive home. Not only were we out a few hundred bucks but he didn’t understand why I would use his computer instead of my own. He had all his schoolwork and software systems on that computer and now he would be behind for the next few days or up late having to go to the lab at school.

I apologized to him over and over and said how sorry I was. He said it was fine but I could tell how upset he really was. I had told him over the phone that it was nothing to worry about knowing the computer had crashed and may not have been fixable. The reason I had told him it wasn’t as bad as it was, was because I didn’t want him to be upset, however I should have been a bit more honest from the beginning and told him that I had messed his computer up and it may cost him time and money to get it working again.

In the long run my husband’s computer had crashed and was not recoverable. In the next three months the hard drive continued to crash. In order to make it up to him I bought him a whole new computer that he had been looking into. He was surprised and ecstatic to have a new computer and to be done with the headache of the old one. His last negotiation with me, was that unless I was completing schoolwork of some sort on his computer that I would use my own for entertainment purposes. I agreed to his negotiation and he has not had any issues since.

It is amazing how many negotiations we all may make in a day without intentionally meaning to. When I think of it now, my whole life is full of negotiations. However it is with these negotiations that our lives are made possible. Negotiations allow for us to view our options and make deals on what may work best for us either in the moment or in the long run. Without negotiating skills it can be easy for one to succumb to the lies of those who do not have our best interest at heart and who are trying to purposely cause deceit. Therefore it is important for each of us to practice our own negotiating skills and challenge the skills of others.

                                                                 References
Hoch, S. J., & Kunreuther, H. C. (2005). Wharton on making decisions. (1st edition.). Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons Inc

Cassandra R.

No comments:

Post a Comment